Clinical evidence and Science 9 1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 3(2):81–100. 2. Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, et al. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. BioMed research international. 2016; 2016: 6285620. 3. Bosshardt DD, Chappuis V, Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 22–40. 4. Camlog. The Promote surface – a state of the art titanium surface for implant dentistry 2020: [2 p.]. 5. Schwarz F, Herten M, Bieling K, Becker J. Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: a histomorphometric pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23 (2): 335–42. 6. Becker J, Schwarz F, Kirsch A. Improvement of marginal bone adaptation through the new promote plus design. Logo. 2006 (special edition). 7. Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Titanium dental implants with different collar design and surface modifications: A systematic review on survival rates and marginal bone levels. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 (1): 20–48. 8. Schwarz F, Hegewald A, Becker J. Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 (4): 417–25. 9. Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Nelson K, Schaer A, Taylor T, Beuer F, et al. Impact of implantabutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and Platform-Switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 (11): 1301–3. References THE PROMOTE® IMPLANT SURFACE KEY TAKE OUTS: PROMOTE® IMPLANT SURFACE The application of the sandblasted and acid etched Promote® Surface on CAMLOG® and CONELOG® dental implants, with a history of more than 20 years, was steadily adapted according to the state-of-the-art. The micro-rough surface increased the bone-to-implant contact and stabilized the marginal bone level compared to machined surfaces. The success of the Promote® Surface was proven in multiple clinical studies (4).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE0MzMw