Clinical evidence and Science 23 KEY TAKE OUTS: LOAD BEARING CAPACITY The CAMLOG® Tube-in-Tube® connection demonstrated a very favorable load capacity under static as well as dynamic test simulations. The connection has proven to transfer and distribute more than the average chewing forces and to protect the implant from possible failure. 1. Schwarz F, Hegewald A, Becker J. Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25(4): 41–25. 2. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform-Switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26 (1): 9–17. 3. Zipprich H, Miatke S, Hmaidouch R, Lauer HC. A New Experimental Design for Bacterial Microleakage Investigation at the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31(1): 37–44. 4. Zabler S, Rack T, Rack A, Nelson K. Fatigue induced deformation of taper connections in dental titanium implants. Int J Mat Res. 2012; 103 (2): 207–16. 5. Rack A, Rack T, Stiller M, Riesemeier H, Zabler S, Nelson K. In vitro synchrotron-based radiography of micro-gap formation at the implant-abutment interface of two-piece dental implants. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2010; 17 (2): 289–94. 6. Rack T, Zabler S, Rack A, Riesemeier H, Nelson K. An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28 (1): 44–50. 7. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20 (6): 875–81. 8. Harder S, Quabius ES, Ossenkop L, Kern M. Assessment of lipopolysaccharide microleakage at conical implant-abutment connections. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16 (5): 1377–84. 9. Wiest W, Rack A, Zabler S, Schaer A, Swain M, Nelson K. Validation of finite-element simulations with synchrotron radiography – A descriptive study of micromechanics in two-piece dental implants. Heliyon. 2018; 4 (2): e00524. 10. Dittmer S, Dittmer MP, Kohorst P, Jendras M, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants. J Prosthodont. 2011; 20 (7): 510–6. 11. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(12):1276-84. 12. Watanabe F, Hiroyasu K, Ueda K. The fracture strength by a torsion test at the implant-abutment interface. Int J Implant Dent. 2015; 1 (1): 25. 13. Semper W, Kraft S, Krüger T, Nelson K. Theoretical considerations: implant positional index design. J Dent Res. 2009; 88 (8): 725–30. 14. Semper W, Kraft S, Krüger T, Nelson K. Theoretical optimum of implant positional index design. J Dent Res. 2009; 88 (8): 731–5. 15. Semper W, Kraft S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. Impact of abutment rotation and angulation on marginal fit: theoretical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25 (4): 752–8. 16. Semper W, Heberer S, Mehrhof J, Schink T, Nelson K. Effects of repeated manual disassembly and reassembly on the positional stability of various implant-abutment complexes: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25(1): 86–94. 17. Semper-Hogg W, Kraft S, Stiller S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17 (3): 1017–23. 18. Semper-Hogg W, Zulauf K, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. The Influence of Torque Tightening on the Position Stability of the Abutment in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28 (5): 538–41. References SCIENCE BEHIND THE IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTIONS
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE0MzMw