Clinical evidence and Science

Clinical evidence and Science 35 1. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(2):109–17. 2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11–25. 3. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:2–21. 4. Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9–21. 5. Waller T, Herzog M, Thoma DS, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(6):517–25. 6. Knöfler W, Barth T, Graul R, Krampe D, Schmenger K. Beobachtung an 10.000 Implantaten über 20 Jahre – Eine retrospektive Studie. Implantologie. 2017;25(4):413–21. 7. Knöfler W, Barth T, Graul R, Krampe D, Schmenger K. Über 20 Jahre Beobachtungen an 10 000 Implantaten – eine retrospektive Studie. Implantologie Journal. 2019 (1&2):14–24. 8. Knöfler W, Barth T, Graul R, Krampe D, Schmenger K. Beobachtung an 10 000 Implantaten über 20 Jahre – eine retrospektive Studie / Einfluss der Suprakonstruktion auf die Überlebensrate. Implantologie. 2018;26(3):293-304. 9. Beschnidt SM, Cacaci C, Dedeoglu K, Hildebrand D, Hulla H, Iglhaut G, et al. Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG® SCREW-LINE implants with or without Platform-Switching abutments. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):33. 10. Vanlioglu B, Özkan Y, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Clinical and radiographic outcome of Camlog implants in partially edentulous cases after an observation period of 10 years. 5th International Camlog Congress; Valencia, Spain 2014, Poster. 11. Nelson K, Semper W, Hildebrand D, Ozyuvaci H. A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acidetched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(4):726–32. 12. Semper W, Hildebrand D, Özyuvaci H, Nelson K. Erfolgsrate von Implantaten mit sandgestrahlter und geätzter Oberfläche im Oberkiefer nach einer Einheilzeit von zwölf Wochen: eine retrospektive Analyse. Success rate of sandblasted and acid-etched maxillary implants after a healing period of twelve weeks: a retrospective analysis. Z Zahnärztl Impl. 2007;23(3):176–85. 13. Semper W, Heberer S, Nelson K. Early loading of root form and conical implants with a sandblasted large-grit acid-etched surface: a 6-year clinical follow-up. Implants. 2008(2):1–9. 14. De Lange GL, Randelzhofer P, Sipos P, de Bruin M, Both CJ. Survival and risks of immediate placed anterior implants. 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the EAO; October 6–9; Glasgow 2010, Poster. 15. Krennmair S, Weinlander M, Malek M, Forstner T, Krennmair G, Stimmelmayr M. Clinical Outcome of Implants Placed in Staged Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed with Autogenous Bone at Three Different Ratios: A 5-Year Prospective Follow-up Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(21):1351–61. 16. Krennmair S, Hunger S, Forstner T, Malek M, Krennmair G, Stimmelmayr M. Implant health and factors affecting peri-implant marginal bone alteration for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation: A 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):32–41. 17. Strietzel FP, Reichart PA. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particleblasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):591–600. 18. Seemann R, Jirku A, Wagner F, Wutzl A. What do sales data tell us about implant survival? PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171128. 19. Lee DW, Kim NH, Lee Y, Oh YA, Lee JH, You HK. Implant fracture failure rate and potential associated risk indicators: An up to 12-year retrospective study of implants in 5,124 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(3):206–17. 20. Ackermann K-L, Barth T, Cacaci C, Kistler S, Schlee M, Stiller M. Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6(1):14. 21. Cacaci C, Ackermann KL, Barth T, Kistler S, Stiller M, Schlee M. A non-interventional multicenter study to document the implants success and survival rates in daily dental practices of the CONELOG® screw-line implant. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(6):2609-16. 22. Fierravanti L, Ambrosio N, Molina A, Sanz I, Martin C, Blanco J, et al. The Effect of One-time Abutment Placement on Marginal Bone Levels and Peri-Implant Soft Tissues: 3 Years Results From a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med. 2018;20 (ORGS): Supplement, Poster 1211. 23. Lorenz J, Blume M, Korzinskas T, Ghanaati S, Sader RA. Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5(1):3. 24. Al-Sawaf O, Tuna T, Rittich A, Kern T, Wolfart S. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of splinting crowns on short implants in the mandible 3 years after loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(11):1061–71. 25. Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of Platform-Switching on marginal peri-implant bonelevel changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(3):342–58. 26. Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Nelson K, Schaer A, Taylor T, Beuer F, et al. Impact of implant-abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and Platform-Switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(11):1301–3. 27. Mishra SK, Gaddale R, Sonnahalli NK, Chowdhary R. Platform-Switching Concept in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Minimum Follow-up of 3 Years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(5):e97–e109. 28. Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(6):532–9. 29. Becker J, Ferrari D, Herten M, Kirsch A, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Influence of Platform-Switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(12):1089–96. 30. Messias A, Rocha S, Wagner W, Wiltfang J,Moergel M, Behrens E, et al. Peri-implant marginal bone loss reduction with Platform-Switching components: 5-Year post-loading results of an equivalence randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(6):678–87. 31. Guerra F, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Rocha S, Moergel M, Behrens E, et al. Platform switch versus platform match in the posterior mandible – 1-year results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(5):521–9. 32. Rocha S, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Nicolau P, Moergel M, Messias A, et al. Effect of PlatformSwitching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(4):374–82. 33. Moergel M, Rocha S, Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F, Wagner W. Clinical and radiographic performance of self-locking conical connection implants in the posterior mandible: five-year results of a two-centre prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(8):998–1007. 34. Moergel M, Rocha S, Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F, Wagner W. Radiographic evaluation of conical tapered platform-switched implants in the posterior mandible: 1-year results of a twocenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(6):686-93. 35. Iezzi G, Pecora G, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Histologic evaluation of 3 retrieved immediately loaded implants after a 4-month period. Implant Dent. 2006;15(3):305–12. 36. O‘Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(4):474–80. 37. Ruppin J-M. One-year clinical experience with Progressive-Line implants. EDI Journal. 2020;16(4). 38. Conserva E. Initial stability after placement of a new buttress-threaded implant. A case series study. Implants. 2019(3):24-8. 39. Krischik D, Tokgöz SE, van Orten A, Friedmann A, Bilhan H. An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(1). 40. Hermann F. Perfekt in allen Knochenqualitäten. In: Barfuss A, editor. Dental Magazin 2019. p. 64–6. References CLINICAL EVIDENCE FOR CAMLOG® AND CONELOG® IMPLANTS

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE0MzMw